Posting on this blog has been sparse, to say the least, and the majority of posts in the last year have been Peace Corps and/or travel-related. But I felt that a recent story in the New Yorker by Seymour Hersh was so incredible that it was worth taking time out of my busy schedule (not) to mention.
The MEK (Mujahideen-e-Khalq) is a group that has been around since before the fall of Shah in ’79 and was listed as a foreign terrorist organization in 1997. The details of the history of this group can be read elsewhere, but basically they are opposed to the current Iranian government and have become a very cult-like group with most of their members in camps in Iraq.
It is speculated that placing the MEK on the terrorist list was a purely political move – a friendly-gesture towards Iran at the time – and some argue (including many former Washington officals) that because MEK hadn’t been active in targeting American civilians for many years, its current placement on the list is unjustified. But given that the entire list is politicized and that the word “terrorism” no longer has any real meaning in the American media and political discourse, this objection to MEK’s inclusion on the list is irrelevant.
Also, according to a report by NBC in February, the MEK and Israel’s Mossad were responsible for the killing of an Iranian civilian scientist (and are probably responsible for other similar attacts on Iranian civilians), making them undoubtedly a terrorist group, and Israel, at the very least, a State Sponsor of Terrorism. But don’t expect to hear that claim from any American politician or major media outlet.
There has been a lot of debate about this group and whether or not, being included on this list of terrorist organizations, the former officials speaking at their events and being paid to support them were doing something illegal, particularly when many Muslims have been prosecuted for doing far less in support of Terrorist organizations.
Well, all of this seems less relevant now that we have multiple reliable sources claiming that the US government itself had been training (in Nevada) and supporting the MEK since 2005. It may still do so today, and Israel certainly does.
From Hersh’s piece:
The M.E.K.’s ties with Western intelligence deepened after the fall of the Iraqi regime in 2003, and JSOC began operating inside Iran in an effort to substantiate the Bush Administration’s fears that Iran was building the bomb at one or more secret underground locations. Funds were covertly passed to a number of dissident organizations, for intelligence collection and, ultimately, for anti-regime terrorist activities. Directly, or indirectly, the M.E.K. ended up with resources like arms and intelligence. Some American-supported covert operations continue in Iran today, according to past and present intelligence officials and military consultants.
An attorney for MEK spoke with Hersh, and he asks the obvious question to which there is no just answer:
Allan Gerson, a Washington attorney for the M.E.K., notes that the M.E.K. has publicly and repeatedly renounced terror. Gerson said he would not comment on the alleged training in Nevada. But such training, if true, he said, would be “especially incongruent with the State Department’s decision to continue to maintain the M.E.K. on the terrorist list. How can the U.S. train those on State’s foreign terrorist list, when others face criminal penalties for providing a nickel to the same organization?”
It is about as good an example of hypocrisy that I’ve ever come across.
No one writes better on this topic than Glenn Greenwald. Juan Cole also mentions it on his blog on the Middle East, “Informed Comment.”
Filed under: Politics/International Affairs, Thoughts | Tagged: Iran, list of terrorist organizations, MEK, seymour hersh, terror, terrorism | Leave a Comment »









